G'day
KyeAs you know, your
Green Book shows that the
Model 1 and
Model 2 shared a complex wheel set. The book also shows that the plastic wheel was
offered at some time in the Models' life - as both metal and plastic
wheels are in the Green Book's parts list, covering both the Model 1 & 2.
The earliest reference from a Victa ad (for
self-lubricating wheels)
occurs in
late 1956 - but I am unsure whether this is a reference
to a change to oil impregnated metal sintered bushes; or to the nylon bushes
used with the plastic wheels. My best guess is the latter.
However, the stub axle diameter remained the same, and metal and plastic
wheels should have been interchangeable (I think). There was a change from
split pin to
circlip fasteners though. My best guess is that the circlip
axle ushered in the plastic wheel. There was no interchangeability be-
tween the components of both wheel types (the tyres were different).
I think your question is just about metal wheels. Was there any
substantive change? My best guess is 'no' - but
four factors come into play:
[1] Merv Richardson was said to be a stickler for service and spares.
I feel the parts books must be correct in showing replacement parts,
but not in showing the changes in those parts. Part A could have replaced
part design B, or C, or whatever.
In other words, any change in metal wheels should not have prevented
their interchangeability with other metal wheels. I am unsure whether
metal wheels were interchangeable with plastic wheel axles. It may be
that the split pin axle was for the metal wheel; the circlip was
introduced for the plastic wheel - although note that the list shows a
circlip used on both the metal and plastic wheels (indicating interchangeability).
[2] In the early days, Victa was a parts assembler. Most parts were outsourced
by various suppliers - meaning that there may have been more than one wheel
hub maker and wheel tyre maker (as volume and forecasting went mad). It may be
there were minor
cosmetic differences in the metal wheels. But this should
not have affected interchangability.
[3] When Victa created its Plastics Division it showed it was serious
about being more self-sufficient - and brought plastic parts in house
(as it did with paint). I guess that by the Model 4 & 5 Victa had come
of age. Victa was a true 'manufacturer' rather than 'maker'.
[4] The passage of time is problematic. We really need early parts
lists and/or factory documents to back up any claims we make on this.
It's an interesting question you ask.
![[Linked Image]](https://www.outdoorking-forum.com.au/forum/uploads/usergals/2016/08/full-7392-29434-victa_v1_j01.jpg)
----------------------
Jack