Hi Speedy, Norm & BB, I recently diced a steel Masport with probably the same handle fittings by memory. This looks to be a nice alloy chassis with a flasher looking Briggs motor. As long as it cuts grass I suppose...
Ahh, if only victa had kept producing the thumblatch catcher series, they would be in better shape today!
You'll probably find that an alloy base will fatigue in that area somewhat quicker than the Victa steel chassis.
Not in my experience Bonnar Bloke. It won't fatigue if it doesn't flex in the first place. The thicker alloy metal is very rigid and doesn't seem to pose a problem with these handle mounts.
Ahh, if only victa had kept producing the thumblatch catcher series, they would be in better shape today!
You might have missed BB's point in that it is now bolted with a single bolt through the top. The original 2 bolted side mounted handle doesn't cause any problems
The side mounts puts all the stress onto the bolts in a shearing type action while the top single point mount creates flex in the surface that the handle is mounted to.
Cheers, BB
I live a 24 Hour lifestyle, but every now and again I seem to fall asleep, well at least that's what my wife tells me.
Hi Bonnar Bloke, I have owned a couple of alloy versions of the Victa steel chassis with the same handle bolts on top and they seem to do alright as there is no flexing at the mounting points like the steel version, where you can feel it bending as you push it. This doesn't occur with the alloy version of this mould.
Ahh, if only victa had kept producing the thumblatch catcher series, they would be in better shape today!
MF that is probably because they are reinforced up in that area with plenty of alloy in the handle area on those alloy Victa bases. I have a few of those here