I need some help, I have a Trojan Major engine fitted with a Wipac Series 90 Magneto. Pic below is of the electrics
Now IanOZ has helped me out via messages but what I need is a pic of the electrics from the Trojan Major engine as it has the magneto mounted on the inlet port side giving it a clockwise direction. Maybe any rotary mower that has the Trojan mounted Flywheel up will be the same.
What I am suspecting is that my coil should not be at the bottom as I have spark but not at TDC. The plate mounting only has two holes so it will only fit one way or the other but I am not sure so would like to compare electrics with a working one. A big ask but I am grateful for any help.
Thanks Jack, I have the same pic in one of my mower digests. With my coil at two my points will be at four which is not consistent with the picture. Makes me feel that my set up is perhaps not original a photo would be conclusive as to what should be where.
You just might be right there Jack, shifting the coil would also bring the coil lead into line with the exit holes in the back plate. Good to have another set of eyes look at a problem, I will give it a go tomorrow. Thanks
I have the engine, cowl and fuel tank. If a base ever turns up I am ready for it :-). I will post a pic of the engine unit when I get it running. Hmmmm optimist I am !
Nearly going, broken ring so I fitted another good piston and bore off my junk motor then found a cracked rear seal so I swapped that as well. Once I get it running I will fit new rings and seals, bearings etc.
It wants to go and nearly does but just won't, pulled carby down again and checked timing but to no avail.
I was giving your magneto thing some thought. Did you end up swapping the coil position?
Reason I ask is that you say you had spark but not at TDC. If you had spark then the magnet neutral to points timing must have been at least fairly right - and changing the coil position would have thrown that out the window?
Thanks for your help, I had spark but it seemed to be at BDC. I changed the coil and now have a very good spark and the motor is timed correctly. Points just start opening a few degrees before TDC and fully open at TDC.
Still not convinced it's getting a proper dose of fuel, a lot of cranking and the plug is not wet ?
Last edited by CyberJack; 17/06/1804:31 PM. Reason: Image correction.
I did flip it but it was a no go, I am still not sure if its position is right. A photo would be conclusive. It wants to go with the drill spinning it over but won't carry itself. I have pulled the cylinder off again and tipped it up and a lot of crap ran out. I am going to split the cases and replace the bearings, seals and gaskets, clean it all out. There could be that much carbon and rubbish down there that's it's destroying the fuel mix.
Bearings are no problem, they are the same as Victa and I have loads of spares. I will try the bearing place for seals and make my own gaskets. Rings not to sure about. Once The engine unit is sorted it one thing off the check list.
I'm pretty happy that the coil is now on the correct stator plate core. The second link also showed that as well. I just wish the design was more 'service friendly', making it impossible to fit the ignition coil or lighting coil (if applic.) in the wrong place.
Here is a reconditioned one from Villiers Spares UK:-
Yes Jack I would say the electrics are sorted. Mind you after draining the crankcase out I bet it would go. With all that was in the crankcase compression of the air fuel mix would be difficult.
What amazes me is that I have no record of anyone owning a Rotamatic. We're talking about a very big company - Ogden Industries - that sold these machines for a couple of seasons: yet where are they?
For the record, may I ask how you know your Trojan is off a Rotamatic? I certainly believe it is; because of the fan above the flywheel. I suspect Ogden made the fan, and cast the unique alloy cowl.
The Rotamatic, in its Olympic colours, would have looked outright stunning. A green and gold moon buggy, I guess
All very collectable. ------------------------------- JACK
Hi Jack, I have the cast cowl which has the fuel tank strap on top and the Ogden logo on the front. Colour looks to be a mustard, may have been gold. I will post up a pic.
Spacers are still present on the mounting bolts to lift the motor up clear of the deck, photos are of as found. You can't see the large scrawled Ogden logo in the pic and it is only barely visible anyway.
Secured the crankshaft seals today, looking for piston rings now. 46 mm bore, 2mm ring. Anyone bought rings for a Trojan/Tor before, mine is 75cc engine with Std piston ?
Ive Not seen New parts for Trojan Paul, I think you'll need to find a collector or club who may have old stock, if no one here has a set.
Ive had success with JP before for impossible pistons and rings, if all else fails check em out. Pretty sure they do A fair bit of Villiers as well....like the 7F.
Send them a sample ring and they may be able to match them.
On to them and sent a few emails back to the Mother country. 46mm rings are a common size and even the gap profile can be found but 2mm thickness is what I need. Still trimmers use 46mm and there's loads of them, just a bit more digging required.
Lucky the gaskets are only paper type, wonder how thick though ? Corn Flake or Weet Bix type :-)
Rings are sorted, coming from JP Pistons, odd thing with the crankshaft bearings. I have another motor for spares which I stripped down, found that the two cranks use different bearing sizes.
One crank has a 20mm I.D. Bearing either end but the one used on the Ogden mower has a 17mm on the blade end and a 20 mm on the magneto end. Wonder why they went to using a different size bearing on the stressed up end of things. Perhaps this is the reason for the fancy clutch ? Above the blade plate as the crank is thinner down there.
Well done Paul on the Rings Paul, they've helped me a few times.
Not sure on the bearings?
Gasket size Im unsure of. Basic rule for crankcase to barrel is, fit the barrel and measure the distance between barrel end surface and piston to find your thickness,and use the appropriate material allowing a few thou for crush. Crankcase halves are usually dry,sealant or of the thinnest material...eg paper thickness.
As for the head, see if there is any salvageable material to measure,or just run std Victa 125 thickness?
Anyways glad you got your rings, cant wait to see it running:)
Thanks Mal, Bearings are all sorted, crankcase and base gasket are just paper and sealant. The crankcase has an inner lip to seal the halves, very clever. I can salvage the head gasket but I may make a new one. I will put up some pics soon.
First for Jack some better pics of the Ogden cast alloy cowl Gallery images include:-
Remnants of Ogden logo Carb side Underneath Engine progress Sealing lip on one side of crankcase Engine number Piston Look what I found I am hoping it will clean up for a good spare :-)
Last edited by CyberJack; 17/06/1804:44 PM. Reason: Image Correction
First, thanks to HT6 for recommending JP Pistons. They appear to be the premier company for sourcing pistons, rings and etc.
Paul, thanks again. These are invaluable photos in recording this Ogden version of the Trojan 75cc. The yellow (not gold) cowling would have looked absolutely stunning on this moon-buggy mower.
This mower was painted in green and yellow for a single purpose: the Melbourne Olympic Games, in the year this rare mower was introduced. I hope this motor will mate with a chassis ... some day.
p.s. I love the lipped seal on the crankcase. It was kismet!
All very significant. --------------------------------- JACK
I have to Agree with Jack...I'm really hoping you can complete this little gem with the aquisition of a base and parts.
Thankyou also for breaking down the engine, as engine building/restoring is one of my main passions,and this is one I've never had the chance to build. I really like the fact the casings still retain alot of their original casting lustre after so many years.
Im quite excited about the restoration,as this is one very elusive mower id really love to see complete.
Spent most of the day cleaning parts, the spare magneto cleaned up nicely. It has no condenser, I am wondering if anyone knows what one will do the job, I have plenty of spare Victa ones. Would one of the Victa ones do the job ?
Thanks Mal, no original condenser to view. My other magneto already has another in its place, I think they were a long thin one with a nut on the end from memory. I will put a Victa one on for now.
New rings arrived today and there spot on, tried them in the bore and they are perfect. Made some gaskets while my son looked on, he was very interested as to why there needed to be a gasket and so the lesson began. I have all the bearings and seals so on Saturday I will take my time and enjoy putting it back together
:-)
Last edited by CyberJack; 17/06/1804:48 PM. Reason: Image Correction.
Thanks for this exciting update. This posting has attracted a lot of interest.
For one thing, It has been most helpful in Mal's recommendation of JP Pistons. Clearly, for rare piston or ring needs, JP is probably the first point of call in OZ. For another thing, the larger Trojan was rarely used on AUS lawnmowers.
I digress now, because I am compelled to say something about photographs.
I know that most images that appear on these forums here are illustrative. But - some images - do a little bit more - they tell a more rewarding & complex story.
This narrative tells the 'ring story' and the 'son story' in such a nice way; and this is reflected in the composition of your excellent photograph.
It is an exploration in geometry - circles and squares - but with a twist. Note: - the rings on their package, but the package is on the diagonal. - the circles and half circle (almost) of the c/case, cylinder, rings and can. - the contrast of light table to dark background. - the gasket that appears on the cylinder base. - the hammer, with circular head, has more complex connotations.
This photo reminds me of the importance of images as part of the words in telling the story of members' machinery. For example:-
Sorry for the indulgence here. My message: photographs form part of the provenance of members' restorations. They can clearly add value to machines down the track - but also act as an historical record!
All very interesting. ------------------------------------ JACK
Hi Jack, your comments are always interesting and much appreciated. So many circles in one picture, the crankcase has 11 alone ! I had a look at the post in your link and have added it to my watched topics to enjoy later, I also realise that I haven't posted a pic of the crankshaft. I took one but didn't post it as it is blurry, it's a very interesting build so I will take another one.
Tapped the crankshaft seals in this afternoon, just a note on the back seal. It goes in the reverse way, why I am not to sure but that's how the original seal was fitted on both of my motors. It does have an alloy cover that keeps the rubbish out though
Last edited by CyberJack; 17/06/1804:49 PM. Reason: Image Correction.
That's an interesting observation on the seals. Crankcase seals are, I guess, unusual; in that they have to work both ways: the upstroke creating vacuum, and down-stroke creating positive pressure. I wish I knew more in this area but I don't. Can these seals be driven in from either side?
All very interesting. -------------------------- Jack
Found replacement keys here, in Australia. After an afternoon of computer cross referencing and a lot of searching. Found it by the American reference number 203
I think the flywheel wasn't pulled down all the way on the taper, I replaced the spring under the cam with another one that was a bit cleaner. But it was also a fraction longer which when compressed under the cam held everything up just that bit more. Blade holder shouldn't make a difference on this one as they can run a pulley or a roller or a mower blade. Pretty versatile little engine.
Yes, of course. Thank you. How do you plan to present the cowl? Will it be painted?
Here's a great ad (detail) I recently found. A couple of OZ manufacturers took the awkward route of protecting the engine from shock via a spring clutch. They did this because the blades were rigidly mounted. The clutches were prone to wearing out (in doing their job) and in the field repairers would remove the clutch, giving the engine no protection from shock loads.
Interesting, in the advert it states that there are 3 bearings supporting the crankshaft. I think Victa also stated this in their advertising which of course is correct. A bit misleading to the purchasing public as the Trojan motor has only 2 bearings supporting its crankshaft, I suspect that if there is a third bearing/bush perhaps it is in the clutch assembly. Unless the shaft with the 3 bearings is not the crank but the shaft travelling from the clutch to the blades ?
The crankshaft would only accomodate the clutch assembly, there must be another shaft supporting the spring and blade holder, doomed ! Probably why there are none around now, small fuel tank as well. Just not up to the job, I wonder what other mower you could buy for the same money ?
I was looking at the cowl this morning and there is not enough of the decal and the paint is rubbish so it will get a fresh coat of yellow paint. I will make up a new bracket to take a Victa fuel tank.
I gave the cowl a test fit today, also wanted to see how it effected the cooling as I wanted to give the engine a long run I gave it a good run with the shroud on with no problems but the fan doesn't give much of an airflow over the cooling fins.
Last edited by CyberJack; 17/06/1805:07 PM. Reason: Image correction.
Thanks Jack, I have asked Grant aka Silensmessor to work on a decal for me, hopefully will have it soon along with a few others. Once it's all finished I will take a final photo and video for the record.
Congratulations Paul. I feel these are one of the top 'desirables' of the 1950s era. They would have looked stunning in their green and yellow livery.
I note this one has no branding cast in the base or wheels. Paul has told me it still has two original design fixed blades, and has retained its spring shock clutch! They have never been recorded.
I did some work on the mower yesterday, required a set of rings and a carby clean. Wanted to remove the engine but ran into some problems with the blade plate. Mine doesn't have a hex nut like the model shown in the brochure but a bolt that has two flats, this would not budge.
Clutch is still there with the spring above it. I am sure I have seen a photo of another blade plate that has the clutch on the other side, leading me to think that there is another model of this mower out there ?
Found it.
Last edited by CyberJack; 17/06/1805:24 PM. Reason: Image Correction.
I am sure I have seen a photo of another blade plate that has the clutch on the other side, leading me to think that there is another model of this mower out there ?
I can only say this is new territory, and put in my two cents' worth...
The photo you show is an amalgam of an ad and a separate maintenance manual. The brochure suggests an above-holder spring clutch. The maintenance manual photo suggests a below-holder clutch. A non-hex nut is new to me. Is that a brass nut?
It may be that Ogden did change the blade holder design, taking into account another source: the Ogden Story book (that you also have). All sources suggest to me a conventional RH hex bolt.
In any case, the issue is, I guess, left or right hand threads? My understanding of the clutch design is that this bolt does not, and could not, connect directly to the crankshaft. The bolt screws into the female-side of the clutch. The male side of the clutch is secured by another bolt (or boss) to the crankshaft. The maintenance manual does not hint at a LH thread.
Did other makers use this clutch system? The answer is 'yes' - but with a twist (pardon pun). I know that both Whirlwind (Sabre) and Pye-Tecnico (Automotion) used a similar arrangement, but with a rigid bar blade, rather than your rigid blade-on-disc system. Here is the Tecnico system, with the spring clutch below the blade:-
I guess this doesn't really help, Paul. I have written before about the lack of documentation of these safety clutches. I believe they were replaced - in service - with a simpler and more elegant solution - the swing-back blade. After all, these clutches suffered constant wear.
But this conversation is part of the record of this most fascinating and important Australian lawnmower - the Ogden Rotamatic.
-------------------- Jack
Last edited by CyberJack; 04/07/1601:20 AM. Reason: Added information.
Yes I agree, looking at the picture I would say the blade plates are different with the clutch remaining in the same position. Either way I will have to remove it to paint the base, it does look brass in the photo. I will have to have a closer look :-)
That runs awesome Paul! Great to see you do your magic on another one. Just wish I got that base at Gympie for you, you could have had 2! Oh well, next time.
I guess that's the first video of an Ogden Rotamatic! Just a couple of years ago, no one had heard of these mowers. Now we have a complete running one. The mower seems to attract women in beach attire ...
Paul, can you explain this to me ... its the 'baffled ejector opening'. Is it 'impossible' to injure your foot?
There are a few differences in the base casting also, the ribs on the front don't continue through. I wonder if this is a prototype base in the brochure, perhaps the only one to have had the Rotamatic lettering cast onto it ? A few other minor cast points removed as well.
I guess so, Paul. I do note that the chute post is not shown in this parts list though. This could well accord with your suggestion - that the brochure (and the sample parts list from an Ogden booklet) were both made prior to, or early in production of this great lawnmower.
And I guess you are the owner of the best example!
Cheers ------------------ Jack
A NOTE ON SAFETY p.s. Paul, it may be that that seemingly insignificant chute post or bollard is a great, early example of the emerging issue of the safety of rotary lawnmowers. I note that the Ogden has, in essence, a rear safety skirt.
It is true that electric rotaries received some bad press because of a few fatal injuries - electrocution. But evidence strongly suggests that it was the petrol rotaries (the 'toe-cutters') that produced the vast majority of non-fatal injuries in the 1950s.
The Rotamatic - not being a toe-cutter - and having a chassis base with a rear safety skirt and chute post, would have been as safe a machine as the safest produced in the 1950s.
Last edited by CyberJack; 26/07/1601:57 AM. Reason: Added thoughts.
I would like to say why this ad is an important find. I had always argued the Rotamatic colour scheme was related to the Olympics.
But here is proof that the Bronze medals awarded Ogden were not metaphorical - they were real medallions awarded at the Industrial Design Exhibition with official connection to the Olympics.
I will certainly add it to the record.
Many thanks --------------------------------- Jack
I'm a little bit late to this party! Here is a picture of my magneto.( I hope it loads!)
Runs clockwise looking at the mag. My coil is in the correct position and is producing a nice spark.
I built a mini-bike in 1967 using one of these motors, so I have a nostalgic soft spot for them. I recently acquired one and am in the process of getting it running.
I need a Carby and the bits that attach to the magneto to wind the rope on to pull start it.