|
2 members (Fusion27, NormK),
5,241
guests, and
511
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 124
Apprentice level 2
|
Hi gents, the 2 x black plastic roller ends on my Scotty are very sloppy on the rod which they spin on, approx 3-5 mm each end in fact. Is this normal or do they need replacing as a result of wear over the years?
Cheers - Ross
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,362 Likes: 10
Administrator - Master Technician
|
Hi Ross, If you undo the nut on the right hand end of the rod, and slide the rod out, you may find its the rod that's worn, not the end caps.... 
Please do not PM me asking for support. Please post your questions in the appropriate forums, as the replies it may receive may help all members, not just the individual member. Kindest Regards, Darryl
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 124
Apprentice level 2
|
Thanks Deejay, I would have though being platic on metal that the rollers would ware first? Anyway will check it out.
Cheers- Ross
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,362 Likes: 10
Administrator - Master Technician
|
Hi Ross, I will be interested to hear what you find, mate. However, the plastic end caps should not be hard to come by, if they are, in fact, the culprits. 
Please do not PM me asking for support. Please post your questions in the appropriate forums, as the replies it may receive may help all members, not just the individual member. Kindest Regards, Darryl
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 85
Trainee
|
My front roller has many dints in it, is rusted and unsightly for my newly restored SB45. Can anyone see a problem with me replacing the tube with a slightly larger outer diameter tube - 73.03mm OD rather than original 70.00mm OD? The new tube will have the same internal diameter 66.93mm to still fit the original end caps. This simply means that the wall thickness of the new tube will be bigger - 3.05mm rather than 1.5mm.
The only issue i can see will be that i will loose 1.5mm in height adjustment and the front roller will be heavier.
Will the slightly heavier front roller affect the cut of the grass or machine performance? I think not..
P.S it will be 304 grade stainless steel seamless tube - priced at $55.
Plus less prone to more unsightly dints with the extra wall thickness...
Craig.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 124
Apprentice level 2
|
Craig, did you see the before & after pics of my front roller I posted a couple of weeks ago? I touched it up with an orbital sander & I think it looks much better than what I had. Could even get the result a little better if I had more time. Masybe an option for you?? Depends to the extent you want to go I guess. Re the size I suggest some of the other guys are much more knowlegable than I & may be able to assist here. cheers Ross
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,362 Likes: 10
Administrator - Master Technician
|
Hi Craig, In my opinion, there will be no probs at all with this solution, mate, as the end caps will still fit, and the extra weight will actually possibly be an advantage. The Model 17 "Supercut" has a solid steel front roller, and is really heavy, and does its job well. If you were really concerned about the outside diameter, you could take it to an engineering workshop and have 1.5mm spun off it. With stainless steel, you can polish it to a mirror finish if you wish. 
Please do not PM me asking for support. Please post your questions in the appropriate forums, as the replies it may receive may help all members, not just the individual member. Kindest Regards, Darryl
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,362 Likes: 10
Administrator - Master Technician
|
Since this post is over 12 months old, I will now close it. 
Please do not PM me asking for support. Please post your questions in the appropriate forums, as the replies it may receive may help all members, not just the individual member. Kindest Regards, Darryl
|
|
|
|
These Outdoorking Forums have helped Thousands of people in finding answers to their equipment questions.
If you have received help, please consider making a donation to support the on-going running cost of these forums.
|
|
|
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums145
Topics13,031
Posts107,109
Members17,712
| |
Most Online16,069 Sep 19th, 2025
|
|
|
|